The instructor is not a person. People have varying teaching methods, resulting in students with varying levels of understanding depending on who taught them. The teacher will take on a secondary role as clarification instead, by answering student questions.

Students will learn from video courses. Each student will have a touch screen desk and learn from an animated video lesson. This allows student control of pace. With videos, it eliminates the potential disadvantage of bad teachers. In addition, videos can be split tested for teaching effectiveness. By modifying certain parts of the instructional videos into A and B categories, and analyzing the scores of the students who took the A and B tests, we can compare scores and see whether one particular teaching method was more effective. Obviously there are factors that will affect this, but this is a generalization. With A and B split testing, the lessons can be continuously improved. By the end of the semester, if a either group A or group B shows a statistically significant score from the other, their score will be modified.

The lessons should also be based on a question and answer format. All lessons currently consist of a mess of facts presented with no explanation of their applications, significance or anything. They are presented as nothing more than facts to remember, and this makes it difficult. In addition, questions can be categorized into different fields so that after performance testing, specific areas of weakness can be isolated and resolved.

In addition, students will have the option to choose from three different learning as an autodidact, from instructors or from the aforementioned interactive video programs.